Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: MRS Slot Based assignment among capacities

0
0

Hi Vishal,

What is the strategy is it concrete slot based or what?

Remove the capacity tick for automatic determination are they getting displayed one on top in the planning board??

If possible share the screen shot I might be help you in better way


Re: Display budget consumption of wbs element

0
0

Hi Dio,

 

Use t-code CJ31, type in your WBS-element P-1407SCC-TTES0422.CZSI0 and next select from the menu Extras > Availability Control > Analysis.

 

Alternatively just use program BPFCTRA0 from SE38 (that is the same thing).

 

Regards,

Paulo

Cannot delete .hdbdd-file

0
0

From the project explorer I perform delete->commit->activate of an activated .hdbdd-file and get the error below.

 

 

The trace states:

Error during >>DROP TYPE "mySCHEMA"."myPACKAGE.Definitions::DictionaryObjects.IOBJbased.test.type0"<<: invalid user-defined type name: myPACKAGE.Definitions::DictionaryObjects.IOBJbased.test.type0: line 1 col 22 (at pos 21) at ptime/query/checker/check_table.cc:1735

 

Is there any relaible way to hard delete the file. There are no objects in the system referencing these objects anymore.

Re: SAP MBO Creation

0
0

HI Jitendra,

 

THe SMP version I an using is 2.3 , during creation of MBO I was able to create a Material Document , I created personlization Keys for all the input parameters and defaulted the Goods Movemnet Code & Movement Indicator .

Once deployed to the device the application is just not doing anything, I was told we require to create a BAPI Wrapper,

i can send you screen shots of input fields & submit button properties. Can you please share your email.

Regards

Anil

Errors by loading loading Flat file from BI Server into BI system

0
0


Dear Experts,

 

i am confronted with following problems. I have 2 Datasources based on flatfiles. Those files are stored on the BW server. The process chain should pickup those two files and load into BW.

But i haveing following errors:

1. Error 'The argument 'SALES' cannot be interpreted as a number' on assignment field SALES record 1 value SALES.

2. Error 'Unable to convert value SALES with currency
CURRE' at conversion exit RSDS_CONVERT_CURRENCY_INTERNAL (field SALES record 1, value SALES). For this i used the standard 0sales object which is automatically taken 0ccurenncy but i did not set the conversion routine.

 

Could you pleae help?

 

Thanks

 

Pat

Re: SAP MBO Creation

Re: Mark order at first production

0
0

Hello

 

This BAdI is avalable on the standard system. What is you release?

 

BR

Caetano

Re: By mistake quantity posted in quality stock

0
0

Thread moved to SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM).


Re: Fin Tech Events Research in San Francisco

0
0

Hi Patrice,

 

Please visit the sap.com in your country and go to events.

 

JPA

Re: Contexts and join types in IDT: Best Practices?

0
0

Hey there,

 

Does anyone have an answer to this questions? I am also having a little trouble in understanding how the new logic of context definition works. I've read the document suggested but it didn't help much

Does Crystal server Configuration work in BOBJ Edge ?

0
0

Hello

 

I was looking in Crystal server Configuration in Administration >  Setup    > General   . I know it is to Integrate SAP Crystal Server with SAP Business One. Now i want to know, does it work with BOBJ Edge ?

 

Regards

 

Hector

Re: (MX) Contabilidad Electrónica - RME 2014 Anexo 24

0
0

Hello SAP Experts

 

I am still wondering at what level the trial balance should be reported?

 

According with Quinta Resolución Miscelanea Fiscal (5th SAT RMF Update) the trial balance for the purposes of this fraction, it shall be sent at least to the GL account level and subaccount at first level (16 OCT 2014 I.2.8.1.6.)


La balanza de comprobación para los efectos de esta fracción, se enviará al menos a nivel de cuenta de mayor y subcuenta a primer nivel (16.OCT.2014 I.2.8.1.6.)



I am interpreting this SAT clarification as following:

1.png


With this 5th RMF update, my conclusions are:

 

 

a) I think Activo, and Activos Circulantes are not "GL account", I think this are only concepts

Also there is no Coding Group to this level (so I set Activo as level 0).

 

b) I think the Account and Sub-Account at first level starts on Caja according with this logic

 

What is more, SAP system design does not support subaccounts or levels within their chart of accounts (also this is mention on the SAP note)

 

I really think the report level for trail balance is usign natural numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

 

c) Next levels, I think next levels are optional isnt it?

(with decimals 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, etc.) because are on the second level (segundo nivel)

 

 

I really wonder why some of you decide to report to the second level? I think this is an optional report level according with Quinta Resolución de Miscelanea Fiscal

 

However, analyzing the SAP standard solution "Customizing Activities for Electronic Accounting (Mexico) Version 2.1" realesed on November, included on SAP Note 204663 I found they explain there is an exception:

 

"There is an exception for the Capital Accounts, because in the Results of Current

and Previous Years, both natures exist. In this case, the accounts have to be

assigned at the second level of the grouping codes to be able to have the correct

nature. When the XML file will be generated, the first level grouping code will be

used"

 

2.png

 

Someone has a picture or screenshot of how it looks these accounts usign the SAP standard functionality?

 

- Does the XML show the level 1 or 2 for this current an previous results?

- I think usign the retained account is not enough isn'it?

- Do you need to customizing something in the system to determine the current a previous year results?

 

I think the SAT solution display the first level (54 / 55), but according with the result a D (debit) or A (credit) is set in place

 

 

Thanks and I really appreciate all your collaboration!

 

Note: I am trying to summarize all the doubts in this item for resolution and for clear understanding

 

 

Fernando Luna

Re: WIP adjustment, process order with product cost collector

0
0

Hi Kamal,

 

You are right. I am in WIP in target cost with periodic settlement procedure.

 

But the process order caused the difference was created last year. And now it is already closed. You mean I should reopen the old process order to reduce the confirmation quantity? How should I do it? Please share more details. Thanks a lot.

 

Regards,

Wenxiang

Re: User Exit or BADI to disable chenge PM work order via IW32

0
0

good idea,thank you for your reply.

I will try it.

Re: Packages not seen in /nRSDD_HM_PUBLISH


No price could be determined for subcontractingin CK40N

0
0

Dear All,

 

Good morning!!

 

While Running the CK40N and business getting following error and i know once maintain price at  the infor records for sub con materail at ME11.

 

System will allows to run the CK40N but why the system checking is the price and  valid source of supply for sub con material if we are maintain the following settings in MRP2 at material master and it should not calucuate the costing for external procurment as per my knowledge i think .

 

-  MRP2 Material master data              

 

1. Special Procument Type = 30              

2. Procurement type = F (External procurement)

 

I have maintain the info record like below ME13.

 

ME13.JPG

 

Kindly provide your valuble suggestions

 

Regards

Sudharsana

Re: Company code hierarchy

Re: How to add field in Extract Structure if it is locked ?

0
0

Hi,

 

Did you manage to fix this issue? As i have the same issue with me currently after 7 years

 

Regards,

Surya

Re: A different type of requirement...can gATP help?

0
0

Subash,

I assume you are talking about MTS and not MTO.  I further assume you are not using fixed pegging, which obviously does not allow automatic 'switching' of supply elements.  Please confirm.  

 

I see no reason why standard CTP wouldn't meet your requirements.  When you tried it, what exactly were the results that you found unsatisfactory?  For that matter, what makes you think that GATP 'gives' stock to one sales demand, and 'gives' a planned order to another sales demand?  GATP product check doesn't normally do any pegging of supplies..........

 

Best Regards,

DB49

Re: Removing the duplicate value for the required field in display report

0
0

Hi srikanth,

 

Try the below codes:

 

SORT gt_mrp BY vbeln.
LOOP AT gt_mrp .
  AT NEW  vbeln.
    CONTINUE.
  ENDAT.
  CLEAR gt_mrp-wmeng.
  MODIFY gt_mrp.
ENDLOOP.

 

Regards.

Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images