Hi Vishal,
What is the strategy is it concrete slot based or what?
Remove the capacity tick for automatic determination are they getting displayed one on top in the planning board??
If possible share the screen shot I might be help you in better way
Hi Vishal,
What is the strategy is it concrete slot based or what?
Remove the capacity tick for automatic determination are they getting displayed one on top in the planning board??
If possible share the screen shot I might be help you in better way
Hi Dio,
Use t-code CJ31, type in your WBS-element P-1407SCC-TTES0422.CZSI0 and next select from the menu Extras > Availability Control > Analysis.
Alternatively just use program BPFCTRA0 from SE38 (that is the same thing).
Regards,
Paulo
From the project explorer I perform delete->commit->activate of an activated .hdbdd-file and get the error below.
The trace states:
Error during >>DROP TYPE "mySCHEMA"."myPACKAGE.Definitions::DictionaryObjects.IOBJbased.test.type0"<<: invalid user-defined type name: myPACKAGE.Definitions::DictionaryObjects.IOBJbased.test.type0: line 1 col 22 (at pos 21) at ptime/query/checker/check_table.cc:1735
Is there any relaible way to hard delete the file. There are no objects in the system referencing these objects anymore.
HI Jitendra,
THe SMP version I an using is 2.3 , during creation of MBO I was able to create a Material Document , I created personlization Keys for all the input parameters and defaulted the Goods Movemnet Code & Movement Indicator .
Once deployed to the device the application is just not doing anything, I was told we require to create a BAPI Wrapper,
i can send you screen shots of input fields & submit button properties. Can you please share your email.
Regards
Anil
Dear Experts,
i am confronted with following problems. I have 2 Datasources based on flatfiles. Those files are stored on the BW server. The process chain should pickup those two files and load into BW.
But i haveing following errors:
1. Error 'The argument 'SALES' cannot be interpreted as a number' on assignment field SALES record 1 value SALES.
2. Error 'Unable to convert value SALES with currency
CURRE' at conversion exit RSDS_CONVERT_CURRENCY_INTERNAL (field SALES record 1, value SALES). For this i used the standard 0sales object which is automatically taken 0ccurenncy but i did not set the conversion routine.
Could you pleae help?
Thanks
Pat
HHybrid app
Hello
This BAdI is avalable on the standard system. What is you release?
BR
Caetano
Thread moved to SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM).
Hi Patrice,
Please visit the sap.com in your country and go to events.
JPA
Hey there,
Does anyone have an answer to this questions? I am also having a little trouble in understanding how the new logic of context definition works. I've read the document suggested but it didn't help much
Hello
I was looking in Crystal server Configuration in Administration > Setup > General . I know it is to Integrate SAP Crystal Server with SAP Business One. Now i want to know, does it work with BOBJ Edge ?
Regards
Hector
Hello SAP Experts
I am still wondering at what level the trial balance should be reported?
According with Quinta Resolución Miscelanea Fiscal (5th SAT RMF Update) the trial balance for the purposes of this fraction, it shall be sent at least to the GL account level and subaccount at first level (16 OCT 2014 I.2.8.1.6.)
La balanza de comprobación para los efectos de esta fracción, se enviará al menos a nivel de cuenta de mayor y subcuenta a primer nivel (16.OCT.2014 I.2.8.1.6.)
I am interpreting this SAT clarification as following:
With this 5th RMF update, my conclusions are:
a) I think Activo, and Activos Circulantes are not "GL account", I think this are only concepts
Also there is no Coding Group to this level (so I set Activo as level 0).
b) I think the Account and Sub-Account at first level starts on Caja according with this logic
What is more, SAP system design does not support subaccounts or levels within their chart of accounts (also this is mention on the SAP note)
I really think the report level for trail balance is usign natural numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
c) Next levels, I think next levels are optional isnt it?
(with decimals 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, etc.) because are on the second level (segundo nivel)
I really wonder why some of you decide to report to the second level? I think this is an optional report level according with Quinta Resolución de Miscelanea Fiscal
However, analyzing the SAP standard solution "Customizing Activities for Electronic Accounting (Mexico) Version 2.1" realesed on November, included on SAP Note 204663 I found they explain there is an exception:
"There is an exception for the Capital Accounts, because in the Results of Current
and Previous Years, both natures exist. In this case, the accounts have to be
assigned at the second level of the grouping codes to be able to have the correct
nature. When the XML file will be generated, the first level grouping code will be
used"
Someone has a picture or screenshot of how it looks these accounts usign the SAP standard functionality?
- Does the XML show the level 1 or 2 for this current an previous results?
- I think usign the retained account is not enough isn'it?
- Do you need to customizing something in the system to determine the current a previous year results?
I think the SAT solution display the first level (54 / 55), but according with the result a D (debit) or A (credit) is set in place
Thanks and I really appreciate all your collaboration!
Note: I am trying to summarize all the doubts in this item for resolution and for clear understanding
Fernando Luna
Hi Kamal,
You are right. I am in WIP in target cost with periodic settlement procedure.
But the process order caused the difference was created last year. And now it is already closed. You mean I should reopen the old process order to reduce the confirmation quantity? How should I do it? Please share more details. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Wenxiang
good idea,thank you for your reply.
I will try it.
HI Rajiv K,
Could you please check the below discussion:
BW HANA - RSDD_HM_PUBLISH - HANA packages not visible
BR
Prabhith
Dear All,
Good morning!!
While Running the CK40N and business getting following error and i know once maintain price at the infor records for sub con materail at ME11.
System will allows to run the CK40N but why the system checking is the price and valid source of supply for sub con material if we are maintain the following settings in MRP2 at material master and it should not calucuate the costing for external procurment as per my knowledge i think .
- MRP2 Material master data
1. Special Procument Type = 30
2. Procurement type = F (External procurement)
I have maintain the info record like below ME13.
Kindly provide your valuble suggestions
Regards
Sudharsana
Hi Loice,
Please check the documetation below:
Company Code - Financial Accounting General Topics - SAP Library
JPA
Hi,
Did you manage to fix this issue? As i have the same issue with me currently after 7 years
Regards,
Surya
Subash,
I assume you are talking about MTS and not MTO. I further assume you are not using fixed pegging, which obviously does not allow automatic 'switching' of supply elements. Please confirm.
I see no reason why standard CTP wouldn't meet your requirements. When you tried it, what exactly were the results that you found unsatisfactory? For that matter, what makes you think that GATP 'gives' stock to one sales demand, and 'gives' a planned order to another sales demand? GATP product check doesn't normally do any pegging of supplies..........
Best Regards,
DB49
Hi srikanth,
Try the below codes:
SORT gt_mrp BY vbeln.
LOOP AT gt_mrp .
AT NEW vbeln.
CONTINUE.
ENDAT.
CLEAR gt_mrp-wmeng.
MODIFY gt_mrp.
ENDLOOP.
Regards.