Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Accessing all the line items of Purchase requisition(ME51N)

$
0
0

Hi Qingda Niu,

 

Thank you for the information. My requirement is while creating PR the user will enter the field 'Desired Vendor' in first line item only. When save it the same vendor number will be copied to the rest line item. I have written the below code, in debugger mode I checked the structure is updating and set_data is calling successfully. But the database table 'EBAN' is not being updated.

 

Here is the code.

 

DATA : ls_item  TYPE  mmpur_requisition_items,"mereq_item,

lw_item  TYPE mmpur_requisition_item,

pr_item  TYPE  REF TO if_purchase_requisition_item,

lv_lifnr    TYPE wlief,

ls_req_item TYPE mereq_item,

ls_datax      TYPE mereq_itemx.

 

     CALL METHOD im_header->get_items

*  EXPORTING

*    im_auth_check = MMPUR_NO

*    im_release_op = MMPUR_NO

     RECEIVING

       re_items      = ls_item

       .

   LOOP AT ls_item INTO lw_item.

     pr_item = lw_item-item.

     CALL METHOD pr_item->get_data

       RECEIVING

         re_data = ls_req_item.

 

     IF ls_req_item-lifnr IS NOT INITIAL.

       lv_lifnr = ls_req_item-lifnr.

     ELSE.

       ls_req_item-lifnr lv_lifnr.

 

       CALL METHOD pr_item->set_data

         EXPORTING

           im_data = ls_req_item.

 

       MOVE: 'X' TO ls_datax-lifnr,

             'X' TO ls_datax-lifnr.

       pr_item->set_datax( ls_datax ) .

       pr_item->set_datax( im_datax = ls_datax ).

     ENDIF.

   ENDLOOP.

 

Could you please tell me what I missed?

 

Regards,

Jitendra


Re: Baseline Date

$
0
0

Hi again!

 

I have found something interesting, Is possible that day limit fixed in OBB8 always refer to Entry Date??

 

I refer to this field.

 

scn.png

 

I have made this test. All tests I have made today (01/11/2015) fill due date 03/25/2015. Then I have change this "Day limit" to 17 and the same test (same document) fill with due date 03/10/2015.

 

It will explain why all my tests done at the begining of this post ( 01/08/2015) taked due date 03/10/2015.

 

In case of that I will finally find an explanation of this behaviour but, Can I configured this Day Limit to consider Document day (for example)

 

I believe I'm close to the solution, I only need a bit of help to confirm what I think.

 

Best Regards and thank you very much!

Re: Obtain all Approvers in FM and store them in WF main container

$
0
0

Hi Valter Miranda,

 

The first scenario will be fine. But instead of using (_rule_result) - agents (multiline) binding, create a background method using Business object / class and use the function module(Which is defined at rule) to get all the approvers and respective email id's.

 

Then you can create a background task using this method and you can bind the Task approvers email container to workflow approver email container.

 

Then use the email step to send multiple emails.

 

Thanks,

Vijay.

Re: Confirmation time Lag by one Hour at CO11N

$
0
0

HI Nasser,

 

This is why I had asked you to check with basis team about SAP DB time. The time is based on the time zone basis setup initially

 

Thanks

Prem

EHP7 with Solution Manager 7.01

$
0
0
Hi everyone,
I am about to install ECC 6 EHP 7 for Insurance domain.

 

Part 1: I will be running the sapinst to install ERP 6.0 EHP7 which will give me Central applications (SAP_APPL/EA_APPL) at 617 version.

 

 

Part 2: I will be running the SUM tool to update the Add on components (Insurance/FI-CA) to 617 version.

 

 

We have Solution Manager 7.01 SPS 26 and SAP clearly states in the EHP 7 master guide that 7.01 SPS 23 or higher is required; so version wise the Solution Manager system should be fine.

 

 

 

My query is: in SMSY of Solman 7.01, there is no EHP7 Product version entry.  So after completion of Part 1, how can I assign the newly installed system a product version in SMSY before I start the Mopz transaction for Part 2?

 

Best Regards,

Siddharth

Condition Record with zero price

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

As per the business requirement, we need to maintain condition records (VK11 for material) with zero price. Please help how to meet this requirement.

Re: BW 7.4 Post-upgrade Issue with RSCHAVL - Pre-upgrade measure not implemented

$
0
0

Hi Sander,

Thank you so much to take time to answer my questions. 

Here's more details on our scenario:

  • According to our Basis, the upgrade was completed successfully.  I did not see the upgrade log myself.
  • We have a program to do a mass check on GP* programs.  It generated hundreds (or thousands) errors like this:

     GP37W0FRI7NZY2C3T5LJI060X8A    At the write position, you cannot use offset and length specifications with fields of type "STRING" or "XSTRING". - 349  <L_S_VALSID>-VALUE+0(000004)

  • We tried to reactive the datasource/Infocube/transformation/dtp; but continued to experience load problem.  
  • It's almost impossible to correct all these manually since we have so many objects.   It may also require to test every single data load in order to eliminate any issue.
  • We cannot afford waiting for the problem to pop up in the production.  If it has too many errors, we will not be able to correct them in time to meet customers' demand.  
  • Looking at program RSD_PREXPRA_TO_740 (provided by Note 1879618 - pre-upgrade measures) , it replaces RSCHAVL in data element/table/structure/other objects with other data element with CHAR60 (e.g. RSCHAVL_MAXLEN, RSCHAVL60, etc.).    I assume if we ran this program in pre-upgrade, those errors on GP* programs would have been eliminated or minimized.   Is that correct?


Thank you again for your help!  

Best regards,
Rebecca


Re: SAP ISU EDM: Profile Value received date e.g. similiar to ERDAT/ ERNAM in other table

$
0
0

EPROFVERSHEAD has the versions.

EEDMIMPORTLOG_DB has the import logs. You should be able to deduce the sequence of imports from this.


MS SQL Error

$
0
0

Hİ Guys,

 

while sending data to MSSQL we are getting following error;

 

com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: SOAP: response message contains an error XIAdapter/PARSING/ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION - soap fault: System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server was unable to process request. ---> System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached. at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() at PROD.find() in C:\inetpub\wwwroot\prd\App_Code\Data Class\PROD.vb:line 289 at Service.Dosyalar(SAP Table) in C:\inetpub\wwwroot\prd\App_Code\Service.vb:line 1647 --- End of inner exception stack trace

 

Is this exception on JDBC Receiver adapter side to handle or by the server side?

 

Thank you in advance

 

PM

Sales Order Item Tagging, Initialization & Side Panel

$
0
0

Hi

  Just wondering if anybody else have a issue similar to mine. We have a  std SAP Side Panel CHIP for Sales Order (VA01-> VA03) that suppose to accept Material # at the sales order item level and display the corresponding Material Info (Technical CHIP name: X-SAP-WDY-CHIP:BSSP_MATERIAL).

 

The issue is, if this is the first time I enter the transaction (VA0*) via NWBC, it will NOT work i.e. Just blank information are shown. However, if I exit the transaction (by closing the particular NWBC tab), and re-launch it again (in a new NWBC tab); it will work perfectly. In fact, it will continue to work until the NWBC session is shutdown and restarted again. In summary, somehow opening the 2nd tab session does something to make it work!

 

  This is what I have checked so far during the first entry

  a) Via the GUI Property collector, I verified that the value /BSSP/:MATNR is updated correctly and the corresponding is reflected correctly in in NWBC_VS_GUI_TAG.

  b) Opening up the Side Panel Data Context Viewer, I do NOT see tag  /BSSP/:MATNR (In fact, it is only showing the Header Level Tag). The Tag only seems to appear on my 2nd entry ...

  c) RZ11 parameter "sapgui/user_scripting" = true and User Scripting had also been turned on.

 

 

Regards

Damean

Re: BAPI_J_1B_NF_CREATEFROMDATA issue for Complementary Nota Fiscals

$
0
0

The issue was fixed by SAP through a new OSS note 2116063. I tested the note and it works fine now (as expected).

Re: Reporte de Facturas Credito / Contado y nota de credito

$
0
0

Por como describes tu necesidad, te recomiendo crear un nuevo query pero cambia todo lo que tengas de OINV por ORIN y INV1 por RIN1. Al final unes los 2 queries con un "union all". Además, agrega una columna en ambos queries que te ayude a identificar cuáles son registros de notas de crédito y cuáles de factura. En los campos de suma o numericos de notas de crédito puedes ponerle un signo negativo para que al sumar con facturas te de un resultado más correcto.

 

 

Saludos,

 

JC.

Re: WF Builder --> Process Control step --> "cancel workitem" does nothing

$
0
0

Hi Lukas,

 

The symbol you circled (in that position) usually indicates the end of the workflow. It's not important here.

 

I assume you chose "Cancel Workflow" in the Process Control step. If not, there's the problem!

 

Is this workflow a sub-workflow?

 

regards

Rick Bakker

Re: SAP-3PL WMS integration

$
0
0

Hi Srikanth,

 

Thanks for your input and it was very helpful.

 

PGI will be against Delivery. We dont use shipments.

 

So can we use SHPMNT06 as an IDOC type for this.

 

Thanks

Manoj

Re: SAP gateway distributed install Start of TP sapxpg failed

$
0
0

Hi Pavio,

 

If you are running on a unix platform, run the following command with the user who owns the gateway.

 

>>which sapxpg

 

what is the output?

 

Also in SM49 tcode, create a test command as below and execute it with target destination as SAPXPG_DBXXX and check the output. Is it showing the utility sapxpg in the output ?

 

 

Thanks

Amit


Re: se puede modificar una Orden de Venta ya autorizada?

$
0
0

La respuesta está correcta,

pero aún así, algún administrador o manager tampoco podría modificarla???

Re: Actual Activity Price and CKMACD

$
0
0

Hi

 

Kindly check whether you have given manual activity prices? If yes have you maintained actual prices for that activity or not?

 

Rajneesh

Re: Problems with BAPI_BUS2002_GET_STATUS

$
0
0

We are also having this problem.  Anybody have any suggestions on making this work?

 

Regards,

Steve

Re: Actual Activity Price and CKMACD

$
0
0

Hi Saad.

Do you see the correct cost in KSBT?

 

One possibility is you do incorrect customizing in OKTZ, if you set the Inventory valuation as not relevant or only variable cost and your activity have fixed, the system think the cost is 0.

 

If you have an ABAP, you can debug the multilevel step in CKMLCP in program LKCOBF03. ScreenHunter_07 Jan. 14 16.11.jpg

Re: how to get the universe filter value in the report level.

Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images