Hi Oswaldo;
To enable PowerBuilder applications on the Web, Mobile & Cloud (without rewriting your current application's code) ... have a look at Appeon for PB! 
I just deployed my 3rd Web application into production over the past 12 months. Appeon is "awesome"! 
Regards ... Chris
Are you using a user with the admin right to perform the installation? Is soladm a user with the admin rights? Have you checked the sapstartsrv.log file?
You must hitting some "Access" related issues. Check if there is service called SAP<SID><NN> under services.msc and if yes try to restart the service. If the service is running fine then go back to the installer and click the "Retry" option. If the service fails to start due to an "Access" issue then add the user to the Administrator group and restart.
Cheers
RB
Hello Kelesto..
From screenshot and logs it seems you are installing older version of GRC on new version of OS. High severity message in Pre requisite checker results should be fixed before proceeding.
What is the version of GRC NW you are implementing and OS.? Suggest you to check PAM once.
Regards,
Ashish
Colegas, alguno de ustedes ha trabajado cadCel add-on SGI Warehouse de la comañia GSP?
Necesito informa queso respecto.
Saludos,
this works on my case too, thank you
AT
>>trc file: "D:\usr\sap\GS1\JC00\work\dev_jcontrol", trc level: 1, release: "700"<<
>>[Thr 4216] *** ERROR => OS release Windows NT 6.1 7601 Service Pack 1 4x AMD64 Level 6 (Mod 62 Step 4) is not supported with this startup framework (700) [jstartxx.c 4389]<<
Replace the kernel with a higher release and start the SAP manually from SAP MMC
Regards
RB
On my current client, we have a unique business scenario where we need to maintain GR processing time to reflect "incubation or hold" time for products after production. It is absolutely necessary that the products should not be available to ship to the customers until this "incubation or hold" time is elapsed and the products are inspected & ready for customer shipments. However, the products can be shipped to other DCs within the client's internal network while the products are under "incubation" as it can take place while the products are in-transit. Therefore, the products are available for shipping immediately after production within the client's internal network of DCs. This is why we need a mechanism to ignore the GR processing time while the products are shipped on STOs within the network. At the same time the GR processing time should be considered while the products are shipped against customer SOs outside the network.
To explain the scenario a bit further, this is a simple scenario: Factory A --> DC1 --> DC2. Factory A produces products to be stored and DC1, which ships to its own customers as well as to DC2 to fulfil customer demand at DC2. "Incubation" time of products is performed in DC1. Therefore, Sales Orders at DC1 should not be able to ship until this "incubation" time has elapsed at DC1. This can be accomplished by maintaining GR processing time equal to "incubation or hold" time at DC1 and it works well for Sales Order and its Delivery ATP check. On the other hand, STOs from DC1 to DC2 can ship immediately after production while the product is still under "incubation" as the required hold time can elapse while the products are in-transit between DC1 and DC2. Therefore, STO & its Delivery ATP check should consider production from factory A to be immediately available after production. Note that the incoming production from factory A is represented by an STR between factory A and DC1. Per my research this functionality is not available in standard SAP as GR processing time is considered in ATP check for both SOs and STOs. However, if anyone knows of a way to separate out ATP check for SOs and STOs where SO considers GR processing time while STO does not then that would greatly help.
Appreciate any suggestions or solutions.
Regards,
Jagjeet.
Hi Santhosh,
Even before I connect to any of the systems, the Cloud connector state itself is not connected. Please see attached screenshot.
Hi Prasanth,
These links will also be useful: Automatically split indicator - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki and rounding off and the group condition in this document.Round off Condition Values - Pricing Configuration
Regards,
Unnivel
Hi Girish,
I assume you have the Archive link ID. First the file contents from archive link then convert it in Xstring format and finally attach to Vendor GOS object.
Use the following FMs:
Refer to SDN thread
Attach files to GOS with Save, Retrieve, Delete functionality in SAP Web Dynpro ABAP - Part 1
Regards
Sandy
Hi Brhamma,
Shouldn't the java ports be 5xx00 and 5xx01 for http and https respectively, where xx is the system number?
Regards,
Mark
Hi All,
I am trying to learn Web dynpro FPM. I have NW7.3, but all the learning tutorials I could get are for NW7.0 and the configuration screen is very much different from the NW7.3.
As I am a beginner I am finding it very difficult to understand. Could you please share with me if anyone has any tutorial for NW7.3 or advise me how can I be able to learn.
Thank you for your time.
Hi Lawrence,
Thanks for your kind words.
I would still believe "\u" definitely causes the error and it does not rely on other factors.
(Mostly due to the fact that I'm saying this remotely.. Besides that, we are not involving dynamic factors like network, racing, etc)
Afaik, the config.properties file comes with guilty "\u" after installation.
Indeed under this case it's unwise for PcdCheckTool to read it via Properties.load() method.
Nevertheless if you ever change the connection property in configtool, the "\u" will automatically become "/u", and issue won't occur.
Otherwise you have to change "\u" to "/u" or "\\u" manually.
In contrary, configtool (7.3 +) reads "\u", "/u" and "\\u" perfectly. Why?
Configtool implemented its own method to avoid this IllegalArgumentException. (checked on 7.3)
(It was also using Properties.load in earlier releases)
Perhaps it's because configtool is much more popular than PcdCheckTool. 
BR, Tom
Hi Sriram,
For logon data, you can compose the URL like this:
http://<host>:<port>/irj/portal?j_user=<username>&j_password=<password>
You can post other data as query string similarly.
But out of curiosity, why do you have such requirement?
You have to set a URL for every user?
How about SPNego, SAML or HeaderVariable authentication?
BR, Tom
Hi luke,
thank you for sharing the document 
rgds,
Hilmawan
Hi DB,
Thanks for your answer!!! 
The key was the "no storage location inspection". Now, the ATP is showing the correct qtys.
I'm going to comment this to my client, but I'll not recommend to do that due the inconsistences that could happen.
Regards.
Diego.
Hi Stacy,
A bit tricky to achieve what you are trying. But give this a try
Page 1
Main window
Loop 1 - For item details
Table - For material characteristics
Header
Main
Folder 1*
Line Type - for Item Header & Data
Line Type - for Material Characteristic Header
Line Type - for Material Characteristic Data
Command node for page break
* - Checkbox related to pagebreak settings checked only at folder and not at other rows/ line type
Regards,
Pulkit
Hi Enrique,
If you run your crystal out of b1i scenario it runs ok? Did your scenario use some param?
Regards
Dave
Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan
