Oi Michael
Confesso que não sei se entendi. Você quis dizer que o pedido é de 100 peças sendo que o fornecedor faturou (na NF-e) 200 peças e o sistema está gerando erro somente na etapa de entrada de mercadoria! Isso?
Abraço
Eduardo Chaga
Oi Michael
Confesso que não sei se entendi. Você quis dizer que o pedido é de 100 peças sendo que o fornecedor faturou (na NF-e) 200 peças e o sistema está gerando erro somente na etapa de entrada de mercadoria! Isso?
Abraço
Eduardo Chaga
Reason is, security team says though they remove the authorization object 15 for F110 , there are other T Codes that this authorization object is attached, where user can execute and generate the payment proposal medium .
First, in my reply I suggest to remove activity 15 only, not the whole object. Hope this is your typo error.
Second, to answer your question – yes i.e. F111, but why it matters?
If your security team is unsure then they need to compare list of users who have F110 with a list of those having each of 2 objects mentioned above with field FBTCH = 15. This way they will be able to assess the impact of removing this activity from particular roles and not disturb anything or anybody else. Armed with SUIM and SU24 they should be able to do so. It all depends on how your roles are build, but it’s off topic.
Alternatively you might want to look to modify standard screen 1106 in program SAPF110V and try to remove checkbox F110V-XMITD. But IMHO it’s much worse then remove authorization values from roles.
Hi,
Please check my attachment.
The template is for Goods Receipt. Hope it can help.
Regards,
Triadi
Thanks for the response Mr. Jawahar Konduru.
OS: Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
Ram: 32GB
System type: 64 bit Operating System
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2643 0 @ 3.30 GHz
these are the specs of the server..
Field selection can be different based upon PO document type, but can't be based upon purchase organization.
Read my blog post A brief interpretation about field selection and screen layout used in MM , I have given the possibile way to make different field selection. If anything can't fit , then continue with development.
Hi Diwakar,
I have maintained the same settings but still not getting printed. Seems inspection characteristic is mandatory if I want to print inspection instruction.
Daniel
Hi Experts ,
Could you please reply if anyone faced the same issue on this or any work around solution .
Thanks,
Bhareth
Hi Grayson
To disable multiple territories per account:
1. Navigate to Business Configuration work center
2. Click on Implementation Projects - Edit Project Scope
3. Go to Questions section
4. Open scoping element Sales - Account and Activity Management - Territory Management (see attached screenshot)
Thanks
Karan
Hello,Experts:
When i Modifying the Screen I hided the Group Control Component,But After i save & exit ,The Group Control Caption text is still display, anyone help?
Sei que seu post é antigo, mas tive o mesmo problema dentro da VL02n.(movt 862)
Acabei debbugando para ver aonde realmente era o problema.
Meu problema era na determinação do imposto de MM que está atrelado ao imposto de SD por configuração (processo de STO), tinhamos mais que 1 e o programa se perdia..
O que eu reparei nos diversos tópicos é que temos uma dificuldade de mapear o erro, visto que a Mensagem acaba sendo genérica e não direcionada.
Apesar de não ajudá-lo, posso colaborar com alguém em sua pesquisa pelo erro.
HI Pankaj
Standard behavior is that when you create a PR and release it then it will create a SC
If you update the PR the same SC gets updated again .
However please check if there is any customizations in your inbound to SRM or outbound to ECC which could cause this issue
Or it could be due to a bug for which you should raise to SAP
Transfer of Purchase Requisitions from ECC MM to SRM - Supplier Relationship Management - SCN Wiki
http://scn.sap.com/thread/922213
Regards
Vinita
The issue was caused by a 32bit-64bit confusion. There seems
to be a persisting link to 32bit dll at startup, as SAP support explained.
I had to rename the conflicting sapjco3.dll in the folder C:\Program Files (x86)\SAP
BusinessObjects\SAP BusinessObjectsEnterprise XI 4.0\win32_x86. That resolved the issue
Hi,
Did you try using Code list Restriction with out writing any logic in SDK.
Thanks,
Raju
Dear Experts,
I have an issue of foreign currency vendors contained in previous payment runs proposal.
Scenario :
1st F110. Payment Run - ABCD1 on 01.08.2015
parameters
Vendors 1-999999, payment method A,B
Company Code = 1000
payment method 'D' excluded. in Free selection tab
2nd F110 payment Run ABCD2 on 12.08.2015
parameters = vendors 1-9999999 , payment method =D
Company Code = 1000
For both payment runs maintained variant in Print/data medium tab
Variant = xyz
Company Code = 1000.
payment method = A,B and D
****For second payment run which is ABCD2****
I am using same variant for printout which has got payment method A,B and D.
My Assumption:
Here I assume that I need to remove payment method A and B in printout variant for program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM because 2nd F110 doing only for D payment method.
My Query :
If I remove payment methods A and B for next payment run i.e. ABCD2 on 12.08.2015, can the below be solved.
"vendor 123456 1000 is contained in proposal 01.08.2015 ABCD1; no editing"
Please suggest.
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Abdul
how to maintain? #vi hdbenv.sh? In general, SAP_RETRIEVAL_PATH =?
Dear Experts,
We are building a SOLMAN System for POC and we have run into an issue with post implementation step.
We tried to configure SOLMAN ie (solman_setup) and it doesn't get pass the logon screen.
Initially it threw error that SSO not possible as HTTPS not configured.
Through SCN blogs, I made sure that we don't get those errors anymore.
Now, although we don't get HTTPS warning, but still it doesn't go beyond the (solman_setup) logon screen.
I have already activated the necessary solman webdynpro services.
Its a freshly build system and SGEN has already completed successfully.
Now my suspicion is that SOLMAN SPS13 needs HTTPS connection ? But I want to get it confirmed or if there is a workaround available for my problem.
I hope, you would have already got that I don't need highly secure HTTPS setup in my SOLMAN, as what the implelemtation guide suggests.
Also, when I checked for my other solman 7.1 SPS4, there everything is working fine on HTTP connection.
Thanks
Abhijeet
I'm using OLE DB (ADO) Connection on my Crystal Report. If i preview a sample data from server it show data that i need but after Uploading the layout on my database and preview the lay out that i've uploaded it doesn't show any data from my data base. Did i missed anything? Please help me with this.
Regards
Meimei Nambatac
Acknowledging Jurgen.
I forgot about the org structure in which cross-company structure will allow you to create purchase order in single purch org for multiple company while company code specific structure
is company specific which might suit to his requirements
Thanks,
Harvey
You can check how the status table looks for the sales orders created with these two different settings.
Check the values of table VBUP-UVALL and VBUV to see the difference. The status of the document may vary in both the cases.
Regards,
Hi Raju,
Can you check if below tables and views contain any data. The metadata must be stored in the AL_tables and ALVW_ views
List of some Tables and Views in Data Service Repository
Regards
Arun Sasi