Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Problem with output of Outbound Delivery

0
0

If YPDF is not some kind of valuated delivery note (for valuated delivery notes you need to generate a proforma to fetch pricing data), then there are basically two ways to process the delivery outputs in case you have shipment processing:

  • The first one is by using activity profiles for the shipment, which fetch the outputs and process them.
  • The second one is without using activity profile, but relying only on the output determination and processing in shipping. For the second option you need a way to tell the system to process the output. Since you do not use activity profile, you can set the condition record to immediate and after it is determined (posting goods issue is a change in the delivery), the output is determined and with processing 4 it should go to green.

In case you need to print valuated delivery notes, the situation is a bit different - there you rely on a collective shipment output, to which you assign the delivery outputs. You do not set the delivery outputs in the activity profiles, just the shipment output. In this case you have to set the processing time to 3, otherwise the main program, that is used for DSDP will result in error.

In case you have a user exit for output determination - e.g. redirecting to a different printer, then setting the delivery output to immediate processing might not work as well.

I would suggest that you try the option with immediate delivery output and with requirement 1 (without activity profile usage) and see whether it works for your scenario.

In some cases the root cause for output determination and processing can be incorrectly developed print requirement, but since you stated that you use a SAP standard one, I believe that this is not the case.

If you decide to use the source tcode as a criteria in a new print requirement - you may need to evaluate a number of possible ways to print/reprint a delivery output (VL03n, VL02N, VT70, VL71 are the first that come to mind). It is not impossible, but could be a challenging task.

Edit:

You might want to check the explanation and the possible solutions in this SAP note - 509475 - Delivery output: Behavior during GI posting via shipment .


Re: Need Career guidance

Re: System asking to change password everytime a user is trying to Login.

0
0

1- Switching to Service would obviously remove the problem from its roots only but that is not what I am looking for. Dialog user cannot be changed to service.

2- I have invested a lot of time on USR02 but without any fruit. BTW may I ask what plausible relation TZONE would have on password. Also couldn't find the field PWDDATE.

 

Br

Arya

Re: How can I fetch business user from CRM to PPM?

0
0

Dear Darijo,

 

follow up the steps as described in the configuration guide in chapter "Setting up Project Management

with HCM in PLM". (The configuration guide is attached to note 2026421, 1826389)

 

Best regards,
Judith

Re: BCS problems after BW version upgrade from 7.0 to 7.4

0
0

Baran,

 

It would be helpful for us to know more specifically, what the problems are that you are encountering during the translation.

 

Thanks, Dan

Re: BW-IP: Report (or tool) to display invalid planning positions only

0
0

Hi Gregor,

 

thanks for your reply. Yes, we have modelled characteristic relationships to detect invalid combinations during planning and do have function/button for deletion of invalid combinations. However, trouble is that master data, which are basis for aforementioned characteristic relationships, are being changed without any notice to planners (i.e. material has changed the group; we do have a lot of materials, 40.000+). Almost every planner has a few planning transactions (for materials, services, ...) and is responsible for more organizational units/parameter sets (cost center group, cost center, ...). Each of organizational unit/parameter set has tens or even hundreds of planning positions associated with it. Hence, it is not that easy to run through all these transactions (in planning mode using input-ready query) and parameter sets on regular basis.

 

It might happen that master data are being changed more frequently than planning (transactional) data. We are using IP Web interface. As far as I understood, your suggestion is to make a planning form (input-ready query) which would be used just for control.

Unfortunately, it seems to me like our pain points will still remain since:

- planner needs to run it manually from time to time (daily?) which is time consuming

- there a lot of parameter sets for each planner, maybe this might be overcame

- for each parameter set planner needs to scroll down through lots of records to visually detect invalid combinations

- there are few different planning transactions (based on different providers and their characteristic relationships).

 

Ideally, we need (automated) warning mechanism about invalid combinations only which requires no significant effort from planner side. Deletion and reposting of invalid combinations would remain the same.

 

Kind regards, Josko.

Re: Help with SAP Workflow Engine

0
0

Hi Andy,

You have a workflow engine.  It's there, on your system.  SAP Workflow is a great tool when used properly.  So keep reading.  There are tutorials here on SCN about it, and there are even some books on the topic (see SAP Press).

But please do some more reading first!
Sue

Re: Deconsolidation in Inbound Delivery

0
0

Remaining screenshots-


Re: Issue in My Leave Requests (Version 2)

0
0

do you have SSO between systems and your user exist in the period? can you check two and please share the logs of browser console.

Re: Deconsolidation in Inbound Delivery

0
0

Thankyou Rohit,

 

It was indeed a very good explanation,but unfortunately I am not able to get task for IB02 in case 2 anymore and in both cases IB03 is always in waiting status.I have attached screenshots of all the steps you and Suraj Tatpalliwar mentioned.

 

Can you take a look and tell me what is still missing or if you need additional info?I checked SMQ2 also, I could not identify any relevant stuck queue (However I am still wondering,i am processing steps in EWM right now why should it go to any queue?)

 

My main concern right now is to figure out why IB03 is not active.

 

I really appreciate efforts with which you both are involved in resolving this issue.

 

Regards,

Khsuhboo

Re: CR runtime uses tables from the wrong schema (Oracle)

0
0

CR does not support synonyms.

 

Don

Re: Inline Editing SAP UI5 Table Data???????

0
0

Hi Nagaraju,

 

You mean like this - Plunker - Untitled

 

You can edit the name and hit enter, your JSON model will be updated.

 

Regards,

Sai Vellanki.

Re: What is the best way to run a CR report generically from a .Net application ?

0
0

HI Costa,

 

CR does not support Oracle synonyms. To use RAS you have to add the assemblies.

 

Click on the Overview tab and on the left you'll see a link to get samples, RAS samples are there, download them and try some of them. It will answer a lot of your questions on how to....

 

Don

Re: SCRT

0
0

Hi

 

I did put before ADDCU and it is not working. It is still doing it under RT instead of SCRT.

Please help.

 

Regards

Letlapa

Re: Brand image change


Re: No data in source system but in BI reporting showing data

0
0

The data is available since 2010.. and data is compressed till last month.

 

Thanks - Hari

Re: MQ JMS Issue in PO 7.4 AEX

Re: How to test that auto-notifications in Alerts inbox is working

0
0

I am facing the same issue, checked SolMan_BTC already have the role and SMTP address, but still the system unable to sent an auto notification although the manual notification working fine.

In transaction SLG1 it shows that the auto notification failing but without any details.

 

Is there any way to resolve or troubleshoot this issue ?

 

Thanks

Re: Link between a custom receipt and a standard requirement

0
0

Luan,

Our desire is to make it possible for the planner to clearly identify which sales order a certain receipt refers to, similarly as we see the link between a stock transfer order and the requirement that it generates in a source location.

This business functionality is normally met through the establishment of either a fixed or dynamic pegging structure.


Do you see a way to do this?

The solution would depend upon many factors, including the planning engine you are using. Since your existing solution is achieved through enhancement,  creation of a corresponding pegging structure will probably require more enhancement.  Create the functional spec and hand it off to your programmers.


Best Regards,

DB49

Re: BW version for BPC/FC

0
0

Sorry Aravind, yes it Financial Consolidation (FC- former Carthesis tool),

 

Regards,

 

Baran.

Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images