Es que por ejemplo yo seleccione los terceros entre ellos me elimino 2 bancos, estos bancos si los usamos entonces me quedo con la duda... De que tan eficiente sea el asistente o que problemas podría generar.
Con estos bancos realizamos pagos recibidos, efectuados, reconciliaciones, etc.. pero aun asi los elimino...
Tienen asientos por montón.
Hi Mahesh,
I would assume you need to verify if dot symbol exists after the at sign, but not anywhere in the e-mail address, right? If so, following UDF shall fulfil your requirement (assuming "eMailAddress" is a function argument of type String, which contains the validated e-mail address):
if (eMailAddress.matches("^.+@.+\\..+$")) { return eMailAddress;
} else { return "error";
}
It shall be noted that complete validation of an e-mail address has more checks than only verification of existence of the at and dot signs. So if you need to go ahead and implement more advanced validation of an e-mail address, then you may check one of 3rd party libraries and make use of them in the developed UDF. For example, you may want to check Apache Commons Validator (Validator – Commons Validator). Using this library, you can perform sophisticated e-mail address validation using following code snippet (assuming corresponding JAR file with the library has been imported and exposed to the UDF as well as respective class org.apache.commons.validator.routines.EmailValidator listed in imports section of the UDF):
EmailValidator validator = EmailValidator.getInstance();
if (validator.isValid(eMailAddress)) { return eMailAddress;
} else { return "error";
}
Regards,
Vadim
Hi,
I just installed SBO 9.2 PL0 but i don't found SBODemoBR. Please I'd like to know where is this demo database or how can i install it.
Thanks
Samuel
Hi DB49,
Thanks for your answer. I need some convincing factors to explain the Client that the Incoming Stock will be always Sales Order Specific in order to avoid wrong material shipment to diff order.
Yes now it works and I don't see the error,
but I can't get any log msg from console anymore ?!
So I can't see the oEvent log from below:
console.log("test", oEvent);And the console also stop logging anything from any other functions I have.
I noticed this log msg that appear first from i5chart then after that no log msg appears:
Script console debug logs(INFO/LOG level) allowed: false
then I will get the following errors which has no effect on the chart or the sapui5 app:
Any idea about how to get the console log ? is there a way to change the debug to true ?
Essam,
SAP SD certification practice questions are available on the internet, chapter wise. Many years back, these were very useful to me, during my preparation.
On the net, you can also find what type of questions are asked for example determination questions - plant, shipping point etc.
Read TSCM 60 and 62 several times and you will have no problem in passing Associate SD certification exam.
TW
change the date format to 06-02-2016
Hi VP
Thanks for your inputs.
Yes our system exists on SP 00 (Initial Stack) version which is a pre-requisite for this app to run. Still I will tell Basis team to update it to latest.
Regards
Parth
Sarvesh,
Wrong material? We already discussed that. You need to use a customer specific material number. You will prevent the wrong material number from being shipped by using listing and exclusion.
So:
Customer A use Material number "X".
Customer B, who wants a material which has the exact same Form/Fit/Function of X, use material number "Y"
Each customer, for a given F/F/F, gets their own material number.
The additional solution that I spoke of; when you want that one customer could have many orders, but you want each order to be ordered, tracked, stocked, and shipped INDIVIDUALLY, requires Batch management plus custom development.
Best Regards,
DB49
Hi Momen,
The log level console messages are disabled by i5SPCChart js library. You could however turn on the log messages by toggling the flag which controls this by using the below line of code:
com.sap.xmii.common.util.DEBUG_MODE_ON = true;
This line should be called before the i5SPCChart constructor call.
Alternatively, you could also use console.debug if it suffices.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ria
Hi Gurus,
Please let me know about acquisition account assignment uses.
Regard
Hemant
Hi Joseph
I tried what you said but it did not work for me. Are there any chances to see what particular file is causing rendering issues or rather say which file is broken?
Thanks
Parth
Buenos dias compañeros tengo una duda.
Resulta que estoy queriendo ejecutar el asistente para el archivo de datos pero siempre me dice que hay usuarios conectados a la base de datos cuando en realidad no hay nadie, a ustedes les ha sucedido y han podido resolverlo?
Hello Asif,
You can change the Batch in the Delivery Line item. Then System would pick the Source Bin from the batch mentioned in the Delivery Line item.
But If you have the special Function WMTA is already activated , then the Delivery would be created with the Transfer Order already created.
So Either Cancel this WMTA and create a TO after the Delivery is created or maintain the Proper Batch Determination Strategy.
Thanks,
Sai Arala
Hi experts,
It is described here: Transform SAP BW Queries into OData Service: Part 1 - Generation and Activation
Now, when we run this service selecting dimension and measure, the key property field "ID" in the result set is empty. Maybe that causes an issue when we try to bind the service to a vizframe in sapui5 as the charts only show the last record?
With other queries, where there is ID filled, we have no problems:
Has anyone experienced similar behavior and how can we resolve this? Why is the ID field sometimes populated and sometimes it is not?
Many thanks,
Thomas Heinrich
Kindly check http_post there is fm called as rfc like
Call Function HTTP_POST DESTINATION DEST_NAME.
If the "Bonus exemption" is entered through IT0014 or IT0015 and generates a technical WT in the /4xx range, than you should start by looking at the current configuration.
As I mentioned before, for one employee with a "Bonus Paid" and a Bonus Exemption", do a Payroll Simulation with the "Display log" box checked, and drill down into the log to find where WTs /4xx and 80xx are created, and try to identify if both these WTs exist in the Input Table at the same point of the processing.
If you look at this screen capture of a payroll log, you wil notice that I have selected folders one by one in order to drill down into the log until I could see Functions P0014 and P0015, and a double-clic on a function or on the pcr associated with it would enable me to see the Inputs, the processing and the Output. That is most likely where WT 20xx first gets processed.
For data comming from IT2002, then you would have to search in the sub-schema for Time Processing (ZT00 in this example), which should be placed before the processing of Other Payments and Deductions (ZAP0 in this example).
As for WT /4xx, it could be created at the end of the sub-schema for processing factoring Time Data and Gross (ZAL0 in this example), at the end of the sub-schema for processing Deductions and calculating Gross (ZDDO in this example), or in the Tax Calculation sub-schema (ZTX0 in this example).
Hi Ionut -
If you have Resolution on this issue , Can you share with us , We are experiencing similar problem.
Thanks ,
Tom
Hi Steve
Giving options to a requirement that is not where the complication comes in it's failing to see this is not a value add to satisfy in PCM. We both agree on this I think.
Satisfying the requirement of interim load updates makes it way more complicated than it needs to be. If you have source file loading of 500,000 records if you had an update every (N=)10,000 records that's 50 updates, and more if the value of N is bigger.
The problem is no matter what you set the number N for number of records, unless set at N=1, for an update you can technically have a load file with less records than that, which mean you'll never see that update.
The reassurance of your client should be gained from validating the data before load and validating records loaded successfully afterwards. That gives them confidence of the DQ and information about the load file like number of records etc.
Thanks for posting an example of a seemingly simple non-functional requirement which shows a business need of the client which is better handled in ETL.
Please can I get some credit for my efforts? 
Regards
Michael
Dear Experts,
We have five warehouse location and want to implement Vendor Consignment stock. Inside one warehouse is everything OK, but at stock optimization we should transport goods to other warehouses.
When we create Stock Transport order (ME21n order type) an outbound delivery and an inbound delivery document is created. Its ok for own stock, the problem that Outbound delivery posting moves not valued consignment stock to valued, own stock. We are not utilize these products only want to store all around the country.
In a complex, half automated picking Outbound delivery is likely important. Maybe it’s possible to post stock back to not valued consignment stock, but we don't know how to achieve this without affecting moving average price and it's not looks a perfect clear solution.
Please give a suggestion or solution for this scenario...
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Andor
