Hi Jill,
Ignore the waring message and press enter and save.
Regards
Dileep
Hi Jill,
Ignore the waring message and press enter and save.
Regards
Dileep
Hi Govardan,
I think your are using LPCONFIG transaction.
Why can't you try it out with SOAMANAGER.
BR,
RAM.
Hi,
Have you done two transactions viz.
1. J1INCHLN
2. J1INBANK
Regards,
Tejas
Hi Raja,
it is ok. Both class types are active with the assigned classes. You can e.g. display them with MM03 and with the change class type button or menu to ensure both are there. In the popup you can choose the class type and you will see the classes.
Best regards
Tamas
Dear experts,
Can anybody tell me where can I find these SAP notes please ?
Hi Rahul,
Unfortunately i haven't worked on this scenario, apart from this method i don't have any workaround to do this. If its really hurting your development i would request you to open a ticket in sap on this regards.
Below mentioned antivia site also suggest the same to do.
Opening an Xcelsius 2011 dashboard with Xcelsius 2008 | Antivia Blog
--SumanT
Hi ,
In my view for your first case , it depends upon how you deal your ist case . How you are manging the procurement in the first case ? Have you creaying the PO to a vendor ( who is not a subcontractor ) and indicate the delivery address ? or is it through a third party process? Please let us know .
Regards,
Hi,
I checked in the table INOB, where we can see the Material number and corresponding Class types assigned to Material.
In the Material, we couldn't all the Class types in a single screen.
Regards,
Raja Durai
hi,
one more error like before when i place enhancement at last.
GT_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS[] is nt defined.
i can see gt_column_description in standard code like
if gt_column_description []not initial.
Is tat GT_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS[] or gt_column_description[]?
Thanks,
Karthik
Hi Ralph,
The code that you pasted has default value as 'space'.
data: lv_initial_bis_datum like sy-datum value space.
Hence you have lv_initial_bis_datum as '________' and not '00000000'.
Simply declare it as
data: lv_initial_bis_datum like sy-datum
Which will solve your problem.
Reagrds,
Vikas
Hi Frds,
Please suggest. How can we achieve the assignment block which is in TREE form ,Might b its not fully TREE form there will be some easy way to achive my tesk. I have a custom table with contain User id and name of each Role(ROLE_NAME). Below is the tast example.
Assignment block display different lavel of approver list.
ROLE_NAME1 | |
1 | User_name1 |
2 | User_name2 |
ROLE_NAME2 | |
100 | USER_NAME01 |
200 | USER_NAME02 |
ROLE_NAME3 | |
101 | USER_NAME10 |
102 | USER_NAME20 |
103 | USER_NAME30 |
ROLE_Name is a fixed text.
Please help how can we achive this task.
Thanks
Imran
Hello Krishna
Check the Reporting currency for both the reports like Object Currency, Controlling Area Currency
Regards
Praveen B.K
Hi Kartik,
SLDDSUSER is not locked, it has the same authorisations as SLDAPIUSER and its password is known.
Kind regards.
Hi All,
Please let me know if we have trial version of AAO?
Regards,
Nagaraj
Hi,
I have created a roadmap inside a tab of a tabstrip.
Whenever I try to navigate from one roadmapstep to another, it takes me back to the other Tab. What am I doing wrong? I have created separate views for all the roadmap steps and separate plugs for all the views of the roadmap step.
Please contact your SAP Account Executive for this.
We have a non-inventory costs that need to be assigned to product produced on production orders. There are two processes -make-to-order and make-to-stock.
Currently we use activity rates to apply labor and burden costs to our production. We use separate cost centers where needed to ensure that we have sufficient granularity to our activity rates applied.
We have a few specific issues where we need to understand the options for applying costs -
1) We have freight and duty costs related to inbound raw material that we want to assign to our final product. The amount assigned may be either a specific amount (or a specific amount per model), or a % of the total cost on that production order.
2) We have material on the production order bill of material that is called out by quantity and we are using discrete backflush, however we have found there are issues with the accuracy of the quantities. We want to have this product ordered using KANBAN (bin ordering) and have the value relieved from inventory when the bin is issued to production. The cost on the production order is envisioned to be an average amount for the product - or an average amount by model.
3) We want to have a portion of cost for production scrap included in the cost of each product produced. (similar to freight and duty).
In all cases- the amount can change depending on analysis from accounting regarding freight and duty costs (these fluctuate depending on the cost savings we achieve with combined loads and depending on the amount of out of country sourcing), the scrap amount may change periodically depending on the initiatives to reduce scrap on the production floor, etc.
We currently use three activity types, labor, burden and tooling. It is my understanding that there is a limitation in SAP that keeps us limited to 6 activity types.
My questions are:
Are we limited on activity types? these are an option to apply additional costs, but may not be the best option if we want to change the amount applied based on model or apply as a percentage.
Are there other options for applying costs that we can explore? I want to be sure we take into account the various options available before we start down a specific path.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Thanks Vadim.
I also tired something like that but the 2nd loop overwrites what happens in the 1st loop. example:
Product_1 has a value in both categories and the expected delta is 2864.7 that will be in V2 Delta member. Sum of 7Z+Delta = 2748.17 which is V1 amount so that would be correct.
But when the 2nd loop runs it takes the V2 total value (2748.17 after 1st loop) and subtracts the V1 value and puts the delta to zero.
Product_2 only has a value in V2 so its not scoped in the 1s loop and thus it comes out ok from loop 2.
Sure i am missing something easy, think i have been looking at it for too long. seems so easy to get V1=V2 yet......
Jim
Hi Gurus,
I am using a guided process/guided view. In this guided process I am using component IUICOBJD as one of the steps. I have created a component usage for this component.
In my case this component is being used to display a BP hence I am creating a BP entity in WD_USAGE_INITIALIZE method of component controller of guided process page and passing( binding it to context node OBJECT ) it to the component IUICOBJD.
During the guided process, if I create a BP and then click on 'Clear Interaction' button, system clears the data and goes to a default IC search screen. No issues so far. However, if I come again to the guided process, the view BuilHeader of component IUICOBJD is not being displayed. All I see is a small toolkit button.
Per my understanding - Since system still contains the instance of previous component usage, call doesn't go to WD_USAGE_INITIALIZE.
If I use delete_component method to get rid of component usage instance, it creates other issues for me.
Please let me know if there is any other way to get rid of instance of a component usage.
Regards,
BJ
Can you create a index on the display field without a parent. You don't need to set it on the complex table field.