Possibly a timeout issue, may be you need to use one of those download manager programs so it keeps the link alive.
Used to be an issue when large files were a problem with downloads, but all current download and FTP sites don't have that issue any more.
Could be something at their company or ISP....
buenas tardes foro tengo una situacion.
un usuario realizo una nota de credito por 50 pesos a una factura de 100 pesos. pero este movimieto estubo mal afectuado ya que no era la factura que tenia que afectar entonce al realizar el pago por 100 pesos no se puede ya que se tiene esa nota de credito. quiero cancelar la nota de credito pero me marca el error No es posible cancelar porque están abiertos los pedidos base. por que mi factura esta abierta como puedo realizar mi pago y afectar correctamente mis saldos.
Hi Fisher,
In your second screenshot, output queue is perfect. Please add split by value after the if output and test. This should work, because occurrence of output field is 0.1.
regards,
Harish
Hi Ravi,
Apart from BAdI/exit solution to have those values by default, you can also update the fields via MASSD.
Regards,
Tiago
Hello Experts,
Have there been any updates on this request since Dec?
--
Amandeep
Code, please!
Hello,
I don't see anymore "Show all reputation..." in my BETA profile. It was there yesterday and the days before.
Best regards,
Andrea
TRY.
lo_model = cl_uj_model=>get_model( i_appset_id ).
lo_model->create_tx_data_ref(EXPORTING
i_appl_name = i_appl_id
i_type = 'T'
it_dim_name = lt_dim_name
if_tech_name = space
IMPORTING
er_data = lo_dataref.
CATCH cx_uj_static_check.
ENDTRY.
*Assigning the structure to tableASSIGN lo_dataref->*TO<lt_tx_data>.
TRY.
lo_query = cl_ujo_query_factory=>get_query_adapter(
i_appset_id = i_appset_id
i_appl_id = i_appl_id ).
** Run Query to populate ct_data based on dimensions , selection criteria **.
lv_first_call = abap_true.
*- Run Query to populate CT_DATA based on dimensions and selection criteria.
obj_query->run_rsdri_query(
EXPORTING
it_dim_name = lt_dim_name
it_range = lt_sel
i_packagesize = 500000
if_check_security = abap_false
IMPORTING
et_data = <t_tx_data>
et_message = et_message
CHANGING
c_first_call = lv_first_call
).
Hello Krishna,
It's actually not a matter of Personas, but one of ITS/kernel.
I had a conversation with an ITS team member and he said that the that the popup issues for which I provided a script workaround should be resolved with the latest kernel patch 7.42 PL415 ( or the new "stack" kernel PL401 planned to be released in the next two weeks).
The problem with the table selection being ignored is currently worked on.
Best Regards,
Clemens
Hi Daniel ,
Our requirement is that if EVENT_REVOKED is set to X in TM , then TM should not extract data from EM for specific event POD . Do you think BADI "event manager communication " in TM will work and provide us required result .
Regards,
Rajesh
Sorry, but you have to call it number of times! And you have to process records by each package... All 3 million will not fit in the memory!
Is it an expected behaviour or a bug to load GUI screens instead of UI5 views for Order from Requisitions with latest shipments of the application?
The app deployment of ‘Order from requisitions’ is with reference to S4Hana 1503 system where simplification is only with Finance module and other module tables remain same and transactional apps should work as in ECC.
The addons for the application are installed as below in the embedded deployment system.
UIX01EAP | 100 | 0008 | SAPK-10008INUIX01EAP | UI for ERP Central Applications |
SRA013 | 600 | 0007 | SAPK-60007INSRA013 | Create Purchase Order from Released Purc |
The back end business process is working fine, but the app is currently opening GUI screen of TCode ME57 on click of Tile instead in Launchpad.
Screenshot of current app loading GUI ME57 screen instead of UI5 application.
Expected Screenshot of app to load with Ui5 application.
Currently the application is calling the right target URLof #PurchaseRequisition-process as in Fiori Apps Library https://fioriappslibrary.hana.ondemand.com/sap/fix/externalViewer/#/detail/Apps('F0404')
The respective UI5 application is still available though in se80 as in below screenshot.
The respective Catalogs and tile mapping are as below for the Order from Requisitions Tile.
Surprisingly, the app is working with the expected behaviour in SandBox system which is on the same component levels , but only facing the error in DEV.
Are there any interdependencies causing this behaviour to load GUI screens instead of UI5 Views?
Thanks in advance,
Regards
Virinchy
Hello, Is there a way I can insert text in the 'Additional Number' field of transfer order header? I am planing to create a transfer order w.r.t. to a TR which is automatically generated at the time of goods receipt against purchase/production order. I tried inserting text in FM L_TO_CREATE_TR in LTAK-LZNUM but it doesn't populate in the TO. I know this field can be populated during TR creation and it gets carried forward to the TO. But is there any way to insert it in the transfer order if the TR was already generated without the additional number? Thanks in advance.
Dear
I am running payroll of employee IT0008 entries dates with data as follows:
First Record
Start Date: 01.05.2016
End Date: 15.05.2016
Salary: 15000
Second Record
Start Date: 16.05.2016
End Date: 31.05.2016
Salary: 18000
Total Gross should be = First Record (7258) + Second Record (9290) = 16548
But system is calculating Total Gross = 16616
What should i do i order to find from where that difference is coming up.
Regards
Hi HR Community,
We're currently migrating our SAP HR server and we're doing a round of functional testing in the migrated system server to make sure nothing has been impacted by the move. During Tax reporter testing, we noticed that the number of pages displayed in SP01 for the W-2C Employee copy is doubled from what it really is (i.e., 8 pages is displayed in the spool list when in fact, there's only 4 pages). Our business users use the number of pages to audit the printed forms against the number of employees run so we need to resolve this issue before we migrate our production server. Odd thing is, it only happens for the Employee copy and only for specific non-production environment. I also did a compare with another system and the page numbers are fine in other environment. The Employer copy is fine as well.
Any suggestions on where else to look?
Thanks!
Marique
Hi Gurus,
We have data services 4.2 in windows environment and Hortonworks Hadoop HDP2.3 in Azure and it is in Linux environment. Is is possible to integrated BODS and Hadoop to extract and load data into Hadoop environment. I couldn't find any document or wiki for the configuration. I am wondering whether it is really possible or not.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Hi Venkata,
We're encountering a similar issue with the number of pages that's appearing in SP01. 8 appears when there's only 4. Was your issue resolved? If so, how was it resolved?
Thanks!
Debbie can you paste a screenshot of table T779B_XLCLSTR here?
Gerardo, estaba confundida entonces respecto al layout PLD, pensé que era diferente
Agradezco mucho tu ayuda como siempre.
Que tengas un buen día.
Saludos
