Hi Samid,
Can you please hast # entry 127.0.0.1 and try
Regards,
Deepanshu Sharma
Hi Samid,
Can you please hast # entry 127.0.0.1 and try
Regards,
Deepanshu Sharma
hi guys
now my system is erp6 ehp 5 sap_appl release 605 level0000, and require sp08 support package stack.
where is the downlaod place, please show me more detail step.
now i am in software downloads-sap software download center-support package and patches, but still can
not find the download place.
please help me !!!
thank you so much!
regards
Hi frds,
Please find me out of it.
I have made field the mandatory from view configuration. but there are cartian screen where user can move without filling those mandaory field.
current when user try to move other screen, system block it to fill all mandatory field.
how can i remove it at run time.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Imran
Hello Rajesh.
Your select statement will work.
There will not be any performance bottlenecks.
Regards.
Hope you are doing refurbishment from one valuation category material (Defective) to another valuation category material (Refurbish)
As per your screen shot, both GI of defective material as well as GR of refurbish material are affecting same G/L. So, system is adjusting that & showing in single row. GI is happening with 171 to G/L 40000400 as well as GR is affecting the same G/L with value of 5. So, its showing 166 as cumulative value.
For refurbishment process, split valuation will be activated by having different valuation class with different G/L. Then you can get the cost tab as shown below as well as as per your expectation.
Discuss with your MM & FICO consultant to define the different valuation class with different G/L in OBYC settings.
Hi,
There is no performance issue.
Regards
Puneet
Is there any article / book that Explained all SAP B1 Table and Which fields as a join for each table ? So it will help me a lot on creating a custom query.
Thanks
Rgds,
Hi Guys,
I'm new to this and I'm trying to find out, how I can create a filter for a "Subsystem Grouping" based on Work Centers.
I've already assigned a subsystem group to all work center belong to a single plant.
I'm trying to setup the distribution model to send IDOCs to an external system
I've added a BAPI with details as follows:
Model Name: XXXXX_LS
Sender: XXXXX
Receiver: XXXXXX
Obj. Name / Interface: RCVPRORDCF
Method: ReceiveProdOrder
I've also assigned all Work center from 1 plant into the same Subsystem Group in CR02 ->Subsystem Link -> Subsystem Group = 301
How can I create a filter to filter by the subsystem group for the work center, to download only those production orders based on this?
Or, is there another way that I can filter by plant?
Thanks a lot for the help guys
Dear Caetano Almeida,
I checked the Badi MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA through se18 where used list. It is used in only standard program. And how to check the CHANGE_MDPSX_MDUP, CHANGE_MDPSX_MDUA, and CHANGE_MDPSX_MDUB.
Here you can see that Ord.Ds is of 2 required quantity but it not reduce the available quantity. This for same for all other components.
You can had new conditions in:
SPRO - Materials Management - Conditions - Automatic Document Ajustment - Control Document Adjustment - Control Purchasing Document Adjustment.
Hi Krishna and Peter,
Talk about being in sync!
When you both replied I was actually looking at the document krishna sent. I tried that method just now but I keep getting a syntax error.
SELECT "LAND2","WGBEZ_2",sum("DMBE2") FROM
(SELECT "LAND2","WGBEZ_2",sum("DMBE2"),RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY "LAND2","WGBEZ_2" ORDER BY sum("DMBE2") DESC) AS RANK_NUM
FROM "_SYS_BIC"."GSA_TEST/GSA3")
;
SAP DBTech JDBC: [257] (at 97): sql syntax error: incorrect syntax near "(": line 2 col 52 (at pos 97)
I'm pretty sure I'm missing something obvious...
Its pretty much the same as u sent, just changed the columns. Could this be because I have anolder HANA version?
Hi
We have a requirement to change the invoicing address for all PO's existing in the system.
How can we achieve it?
Please help.
I am unable to find program RPM_FICO_DATA_TRANSFER in the PPM 5.0 system.
Neither is the RPM_FIN02 (older version) available in the system.
Other PPM 5.0 programs like - /RPM/FICO_INT_PLANNING ara availabe.
Any suggestions for next steps?
Since it is almost impossible to introduce split valuation for a material that is in use and has orders and stocks you should just create an extra material master for the customer material. A specific description could also help the workers to identify the right material when posting receipts and consumptions
Hi Ajay,
You have mentioned to check the SPL in plant B for the material this has the following setting:
procurement type = F
SPK=70
when I check the SPK 70 in OMD9 for plant B:
Procurement type=E
Special Procurement type= E
Plant = Blank
then in section "As BOM component:
tick in the option "withdr.altern.plant -----issuing plant = plant A
Are the above settings correct? because when I run CK11n I still get the same error messages.
thanks
Joe
Hi Bastian,
Thanks for your feedback.
I though there was another way ... I can also use xPath in my select statements to pull my values through into the resultset.
Kind Regards,
Brenden Draper
Hi guys! I'm getting ready to take the TB1200 9.0 certification test. Can you share any valuable test samples? THANKS!
After the promotion period we need to transfer this stock to normal stock with normal stock value.
What happens in accounting? You need to have an invoice or something to match the increase in stock value.
You do need split valuation and like Jurgen said it's next to impossible to change a material to split valuation after it has movements.
Hi Ravi,
We faced similar issue - then we built ABAP solution for that - ABAP program that executes the reports and update into direct update DSO. Then you can this DSO in APD for further processing if required. We never faced any issues on executing BW query through ABAP....
There are many thread available on "How to Execute BW query through ABAP"...Please let us know if you need further details...
Hi Siva,
Thanks again for quick response.
I compared table SFW_ACTIVE_B2 in Dev, Test and PROD environment.
Found that table SFW_ACTIVE_B2 in Dev has one extra entry which I activated today.
Now I am confident that I am not going to export any other BF.
Just a quick last question: What if user ask to activate BF in Dev and then changes his mind and dont export it to TEST/PROD? I think BASIS person should never activate BF if that BF is not going to PROD, What do you think?
Thanks,
Harry