hi Paul,
you can either right click on the field if it's on your report (if it is a date field) and then choose Format Field and then go to the date tab, Customize, and format the date there using the Order option. or you can create a new formula and then do something like
totext({your date},'MM/dd/yy')
-jamie
Me podrian proporcionar este documento a ihernandez@sprofesionales.com.mx
If you select "Local Document" and then select the .rpt file you want to publish, it will know that this is a Crystal Report and give you a couple of options for that. It will then be added to the system correctly.
-Dell
Hi,
yes this option is enabled, in the variable screen i select the same values but like i said with view option there is no data retrieved. With modify, data is retrieved correctly. Also scheduling works fine.
Regards,
Martin Zluky
Hello Conrad,
1) Using the target group you can indeed have your transports going to any other system/client you want.
2) That's where the trick is... customizing orders could not be linked to a transport layer through a package as customizing objects do not belong to any package.
But it is possible to define a standard (aka default) transport layer for a system (called ZCUS in my example).
You then need to create specific layer for SAP object and all your packages (dev. class).
So you'll have layers for all packages and the rest (customizing) will follow the route defined for the standard transport layer.
You can push the logic a little bit further as it is even possible to define a standard transport layer for specific client in the system.
Best regards
Dear Expert ,
Is there any response ?
Regards
Rami
hi Paul,
does something like this work for you
If not isnull({ADRES1.ADENTN}) or {ADRES1.ADENTN} > ' '
then {ADRES1.ADENTN}
else
({ADRES1.ADFNM} + ' ' + {ADRES1.ADLNM})
-jamie
Dear Prashant:
There are two types of STO (Stock transfer order)
Interplant:
You create the purchase order UB type, create outbound delivery, and receive the goods with reference of this outbound delivery. As the movements is between the same company code is not necessary to create an invoice.
In this case one plant is the supplying plant and the other plant is the receiving plant.
Intercompany:
You create the purchase order NB type, create outbound delivery, invoice the delivery, receive the goods with reference of this outbound. Make the invoice verification (this last step could be automatically)
As the movement is with different company codes is necessary to invoice the requirement from supplying plant to Receivig plant.
Please check it
Antonio Martínez
HI this had an error as 'formula has too many arguments'
i changed to this
totext({OEORH1.OHFL01},Date (MM/DD/YY)) but this is error
on MM ' the ) is missing' its a numeric field not date field
Hi Gustavo
another note
1867201 - How to troubleshoot UJP_EXCEPTION_050 error in ownership calculation - BPC NW 10.0
Resolution
Regards
Juan Pablo
Good call
I love it... we're now playing a game of find which table the transaction is hiding in!
I didn't think of AGR_BUFFI as I haven't built roles that way before
Regards
Colleen
have a look at the "sp_modifystats" system procedure to help remove skew from the "symbol" column stats. I suspect that there is some kind of "default" value for "symbol" that makes up most of the distribution of values in that column which drives up the "total density" for that column. The optdiag utility will show you what the column level stats are for column "symbol". If you post that output here we can see if indeed that is the problem.
This is common. A default hardcoded value is used for most of the rows like "unknown" or blanks (" "). When you search on the column, you typically search on a very specific value, but if you use a variable for that search, the optimizer uses the total density (rather than the histogram of known values when you use the constant literal search string) to determine how many rows will qualify.
Also, given that your index contains many other columns (contributing to longer key length), it could also be the case that a separate index only on "symbol" might be more help. That would require some testing on your part and since you didn't post sp_help output, i can't tell if that might be a viable option - just something to consider.
Thanks for this information. I tried a very simple xsjs to test this but its not working for me. Could you please tell me what am I doing wrong here ?
my test.xsjs
function testTrace () {
$.trace.info('My name is Raghuveer');
}
testTrace();
my .xsaccess file
{
"anonymous_connection": "<package name>::incognito",
"authentication" : null,
"cors" : [{ "enabled":true }],
"cache_control" : "must-revalidate",
"exposed": true
}
Then I hit the URL in a web browser to execute this xsjs.
I looked at the server trace logs by going to location: <servername>:<port>/sap/hana/xs/ide/trace/ and then clicked on both the trc logs corresponding to my server name and tried searching for 'Raghuveer' as a keyword but no result was returned.
Then I went to <servername>:<port>/sap/hana/xs/security/ to verify my permissions. I am attaching the screenshot of all the permission i have for this user. I have the debugger role assigned also but still i dont see the trace to print anything in the log.
Could you please suggest what am I missing ?
Thanks in advance.
Can it be because, I have entry in OOW4 in ECQ? I have asked basis to change system manually in ECQ. I have tried version change but it didn't help.
I have copied in to New Task but it's also not getting active in ECQ. Appreciate guidance from experts..
Do I need to change status to Released in SWDD under Basic Data?
if you go into the BOM to the document tab and press F1 in the version field, then you can read under what circumstances the version is automatically updated.
Hi Steffen,
I already enhaced the 0SCEM_1 by xyz fields say..Those fields are not available either info/control/ext ..in BW profile.
2. Assign fields in exit_SAPLRSAP001
exa: xyz = db-field.
3. in BW Profile I see those XYZ field
Question:
In BW Profile, XYZ enhaced fields as Target I see but I dont have anything to assing from info/control/ext str...and that's reason we enhaced in extrct. structure..
when I check in RSA3, I see those fields but no value.
so if we enhaced fields in 0SCEM_1 then
Do we need to MAP fields in BW profile..?
If YES, then How source field we will get because its enhanced field in ds.
Thanks for your big help.
Chan
Well, on Firefox you get this dialog:
On the version of Chrome I am running (Version 33.0.1750.154 m), I do not get any print dialog at all.
This may be due to the following from the CRVS Supported Platforms:
- Ludek
SELECT DISTINCT 'TRUE' FROM OPOR T0 WHERE T0.Doctype='I' and T0.Docnum =$[$8.1.1]
Estoy tratando de que todos las Ordenes de Compra tipo artículo ingresen a etapa de autorización, pero no logro que me funcione este query, será que alguien me puede dar una mano?
Gracias.
In that case I don't have anything to add. In the past when establishing new remote connections I always had a direct contact in Walldorf who I worked with to make the remote connection work. Sometimes I even made the network admins (at SAP and at my customer) speak to each other, it usually didn't take longer than 30 minutes to get the remote connection up and running.
