Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Period lot size doesn't work

$
0
0

Hello!

Thank you very much, Ken and Ramy for your quickly answer.

I will explain that I work in Spain, and factories are in north of Europe. Factories make the replenishment to Spain, according with TLB proposal.

 

What I thought is that, if for example I only bring one truck per week, putting a weekly lot size I would get every morning a proposal of 1 truck every week (or less, depending in other parameters). And I thought that every proposal would take the demand for one full week.

Example: if every day I have a demand of 100, then the TLB proposal would be 500 for day 1. Other 500 for day 8, and so on.

 

But what I have is a proposal of 100 in day 1, other 100 in day 2 and so on. And I don't want to load only 100, because I won't have a truck every day.

 

As according with your answers, I am wrong, I would like to kindly ask you 2 questions:

1. How could I get a proposal as I need (500 in every proposal, instead of 100)?

2. What is then, the effect of periodic lot size in my replenishment (if any)? What is the effect in the factory?

 

Thank you very much in advance!!

 

Julia


How to group billing documents into a single invoice?

$
0
0

Hi,  I am trying to group a few billing documents into a single invoice but not using an Invoice List.

 

Does anyone know how to generate it?

 

For example,

I have invoice A with 2 items (X, Z and Y) and invoice B with 1 intem (X, Y).

I need to create invoice C with this 3 itens summarized with itens X, Y, and Z and their values summed (such as quantity, price, etc).

 

I already tried to create a new billing document and configured the copy control but when I generate the new invoice via VF01, it creates two new invoices coping data from the original ones.  It does not group the invoice, but splits/continues with 2 separate billings.

 

I added an image below to illustrate my scenario.

grouped invoice.png

Any suggestion?

Navigation for Fact Sheet Apps is not working from Fiori Launchpad

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I've configured the Embedded Search on HANA in SAP ERP 6.0 for Fiori Fact Sheet Issue. I can Search the Application from Search box via SAP Fiori Lanuchpad but I can't click on it. Nevertheless, nothing is happening upon clicking on it; remains in Idle State. No Movement...... tried to Debug and found that there are no Navigation getting created in Table.

 

Please refer the attached Screen Captures of Tables.

 

FYI: UI side- all is good. Gateway Side- All is Good. No error's in there......... Most important thing is, Fact Sheet Apps is working in a separate client of same ERP System (e.g. Navigation is not working in ABC 200 whereas Navigation is working in ABC 300)...... tried with ST05- No Luck, HTTP Trace in Google Chrome- No Luck, Deleted and recreated the Connectors- No Luck.

 

 

Any clue where to check or what is going wrong in Client 200 whereas Fact Sheet app and its navigation is working in Client 300 of same ERP system.

 

Highly appreciated on any pointers.

 

Thanking you,

~ Mahendra

Re: Is it possible to search using apostrophe ' in Account Identification?

$
0
0

Hi Nelson,

This is a known bug indeed. You can search for the corresponding note on service.sap.com/notes with the term 'apostrophe'. Let me know if you don't find it and I'll check in our system.

Regards

Nicolas.

Re: Refresh has failed (HDB 00102)

$
0
0

Hi Scott - Since this is a closed/answered thread, please create a new thread and please provide more details - is this happening with Server, Desktop, or Cloud?

 

As for universe best practices, I did a search and found Expert Guided Universe Design Best Practices

 

Tammy

Re: notifications to be received into powl inbox and email inbox

Re: How to get label binding property

$
0
0

Hi glauco,

                  will you please send the remaining code if possible so that i can check it

Re: Update MARC

$
0
0

Hi Caetano,

 

All flags were unchecked.

 

Regards,

Luiz Altieri


Portal and SAP Persona Pages information??

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Is there any information on using SAP Persona Pages in SAP portal??  It feels like the only thing you would do from the portal side is to create an iview with a URL to a SAP Persona Page??  Anyone would like to share their experiences???

 

Thanks

Claire

Auto Task Assignment at header level for Quality Notification

$
0
0

Hi

 

Can someone tell me how to assign a task automatically at header level when the notification is created and saved.

 

Is there a way to do it without "Response Monitoring" i.e. linking it up with the priorities. If not. tell me the process to do it the response monitoring way.

 

Further, we want the workflow email to be triggered to the responsible person who will need to complete the task. We have around 50 plants and each plant has 1 or more QA manager assigned to it. In this case, how to make sure the automatic task assigned when the notification is created will have the correct responsible person listed.

 

 

Thanks,

Sai

Re: SAP Business One 9.0 Outlook Integration Error

$
0
0

When running SAP and outlook as administrator, it sends the email, but I get this message now when going back to outlook after clicking send.

email error2.PNG

Re: Querying CMS database in SAP BOBJ 4.1 SP2

Re: Bad data from unx

$
0
0

Scott - at this point, I recommend opening a ticket with SAP Support so they can troubleshoot this - especially if Web Intelligence is supporting this.

 

Thank you for trying 1.20 version

Re: APO Firmed Planned Orders with conversion indicator has no numbers

$
0
0

Hello Supriyo,

 

Did you check your integration model for production orders? Did you have generated PDS for discrete manufacturing? Also did you check consistency with /SAPAPO/OM17 and /SAPAPO/TSCONS.

What is the error message when you try to do the conversion?

Thanks.

 

Regards, Marius

Re: Schedule Call Plan Date

$
0
0

Hello Sebastian,

 

I have tested exactly with the same settings as you in my maintenance plan 887 but I don't get the same result !  Could there be some configuration setting that is causing this issue?  Maybe a SAP note that needs to be applied to our system?  Thank you for your help.

 

PM6 Capture.PNG

 

PM7 Capture.PNG


Re: Change dep key from Dep / period to Dep / day

$
0
0

Hello Pankaj,

 

It is not possible to change from a depreciation key with Depreciation to the day to Monthly depreciation or the other way around.

 

In the asset master record, the first time you post to a fixed asset,
the system updates the number of periods to be taken into account in the
depreciation calculation for this fixed asset.


Therefore, in a fiscal year with 12 periods, the number of periods is
always 12 unless you use half months or depreciation to the day. If you
use half months, the number of periods is 24. If you use depreciation to
the day, the number of periods is 365.

If the depreciation start date is in a closed fiscal year, the system
must no longer change the number of periods in the asset master record
because the depreciation in the closed fiscal year was calculated on the
basis of this number of periods and must no longer be changed.


If you wish to depreciate as of a certain time considering depreciation
to the day, we recommend to transfer the asset to a new asset using
depreciation to the day. This is the only proper solution.

 

I hope this helps to clarify the system behaviour,

regards

Ray

Re: Interaction Center E-mails and The "RE:" Problem

$
0
0

Hi Gervase,

 

What have other customers done to overcome this challenge?  Is there currently (or plans for) an SAP Note that would address the issue.

 

Thanks again,

 

Lars

Status de serviço NF-e 3.10 x tpAmb

$
0
0

Pessoal, boa tarde.

 

Estamos configurando a NF-e 3.10 num cliente e ao testar em DEV os satus de serviço verificamos que, ao contrário do esperado, o job /XNFE/NFE_CHECK_SRV_STATUS está disparando a consulta de status para tpAmb = 1 e 2, ao invés de somente para 2.

 

Debugamos até a FM /XNFE/SRVSTA_READ_CUST, e encontramos um comportamento diverso do que havíamos idealizado. Ao invés de retornar as entradas de configuração somente para tpAmb = 2, voltaram as configurações de ambos os tipos de ambiente conforme tabela LT_TSRV:

 

 

Podemos ver que para cada CUF temos 1 e 2

 

Verificamos que isso veio da configuração da /XNFE/TCUF e da /XNFE/GOVPAR.

Na GOVPAR temos a definição de tpAmb e CUF por CNPJ, para cada Sistema Lógico (LOGSYS) e Tipo de Documento.

Ex.:

DOCTYPE
LOGSYSCNPJCUFTPAMB
NFEDEV100AAA412
NFEDEV100BBB352
NFEDEV100CCC352
NFEQAS100AAA412
NFEQAS100BBB352
NFEQAS100CCC352
NFEPRD100AAA411
NFEPRD100BBB351
NFEPRD100CCC351

 

Com essa configuração, a ideia é ter uma TO que vai poder ser levada para QAS e PRD com os dados corretos para cada ambiente. Esperávamos que a FM só recuperasse os dados do ambiente em que estamos executando-a, no caso DEV100. Mas não, a FM pegou todos os registros, independentemente do LOGSYS, e com isso, resultou no print acima, onde para cada CUF temos tpamb 1 e 2.

 

Em seguida o sistema passa essa tabela para ser feita a consulta de status, e temos em DEV a consulta de tpAmb = 1 sendo feita (o que não desejávamos). Como o programa principal (/XNFE/NFE_CHECK_SRV_STATUS) não tem mais o parâmetro tpAmb na tela de seleção, não temos como filtrar.

 

Concluímos que somos obrigados a ajustar os dados em cada ambiente para que seja feita a consulta apenas conforme o LOGSYS desejado, ou seja, ao mover isso para PRD teremos que ajustar os dados (ou criar n TOs com os dados de cada ambiente - no nosso caso, temos uns 7 ambientes, DEV100, DEV200, DEV300, QAS100, REG100, SDB100, PRD100).

 

Alguém chegou a seguir essa mesma ideia? Mudaram a definição no meio? Como planejam seguir com isso?

 

PS.: procurei notas para essa FM, sem sucesso:

 

 

Obrigado, abraços!

Eduardo Hartmann

Re: BSI Tax Factory 10.0

$
0
0

Hi Matt,

Where's this incident wizard? ..on MyBSI? ...in the new TaxFactory web GUI?

 

Thanks,

Brandyn

Re: Unexpected sharing violation during I/O to file...

$
0
0

Thanks a lot for the procedure.

 

But i want to know if this always is gonna happen, if more than one person is accesing to the application server of SSM?.

 

 

Thanks in advance for the response.

 

Best Regards,

 

 

Franco Jordan.

Viewing all 8594 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images